Thomas Friedman Is A Doo-Doo Face

March 1st, 2006

Buy Lou's Book

Is that title sophomoric and infantile or what? Without question. Name-calling usually is. It’s certainly not something you expect from someone who touts themselves as a Pulitzer Prize winning professional journalist.

But that’s what you get when you can’t compete on ideological grounds.

Long time sufferers of Dobbs Derangement Syndrome, NAM posts yet another petty little piece of hate gleefully pointing to a speech by Tom Friedman given at Yale where he calls Lou Dobbs a “blithering idiot”.

Just like a school-yard bully who wasn’t quick enough or clever enough to win at dodge-ball and now resorts to playground epithets because… well… it’s all he’s got.

Frankly, being called a “blithering idiot” by Tom Friedman is the functional equivalent of being called “ugly” by a toad.

I guess if name-calling and vitriol now stand as legitimate journalistic tools then I can feel free to indulge a little myself.

Tom Friedman is the buck-toothed moron who took a Discovery Channel crew to India to sell us all on the idea of how good it’s going to be when they ship every valuable American Ideal over there wholesale.

It… was… horrifying to watch. Not surprisingly – it was a complete disaster for the Discovery Channel, and they don’t rerun it – but as bad as it was it was still unsettling to watch the Indian workers (who had all replaced American workers) being instructed on how to ‘adopt’ western sounding names, and being given courses to help them overcome their accents because the American corporations who had off-shored American jobs were worried that those hard to pronounce names and tell-tale accents would be bad for business when American’s figured out they were talking to “cyber-coolies” instead of their previously employed American counterparts.

It did my heart so good to see him fragged by his own troops in this piece carried in the left-of-center CounterPunch newsletter, which really puts paid to his love affair with all things Indian – and pokes big gigantic semi-tractor-trailor sized holes in the myths that Friedman’s been trying to force-feed Times readers for years about that country.

The reason that left-wing lunatics like Friedman (and others – you know who you are you cheeky little NAM monkeys you) have to stoop to name calling and hate-speech when they talk about Lou Dobbs is because they are incensed by the idea that someone would have the unmitigated gall to stand up and call the horrible and unpatriotic sell-out of the American Dream exactly that – Un-American and Un-Patriotic.

It makes them very nervous and very angry when they realize that someone is going to call their bluff. They were counting on being able to stand uncorrected in front of the American people and tell their lies and their myths and their fabrications and sell their unbelievably anti-American agenda with no resistance. And… lacking any real defense - have to resort to screaming childish names. They sure as hell can’t debate the issue.

Tough. You want to sell America out to foreign governments fine, but you can’t be surprised when someone points out the obvious.

Friedman’s BA is in “Mediterranean Studies”

With a Masters in “Middle Eastern Studies”.

Laugh? I thought I’d die.

Not quite the mental giant in economics he’d like everyone to believe he is – and more than a little telling on where his true ideological biases lie. I guess my question is how in the hell did this poseur worm his way into a position of “chief economic correspondent” to the White House? I guess when you realize that Helen Thomas (snork) was Bureau Chief for UPI - I suppose you realize how little it really means all things considered.

Dobb’s Masters Degree is in ECONOMICS. From HARVARD.

Here’s another hot-tip for the sufferers of Dobbs Derangement Syndrome.

All four men carved into the face of Mount Rushmore weren’t okay with the selling of American Sovereignty either. Nor were the Founding Fathers.

They were all high tariff-guys with strong “nationalist” leanings who were very vocal about putting America first.

Dobbs is in good company.

So… you can call Dobbs “Fat Bastard” or a “blithering idiot” or a “terrorist” or a “xenophobe” all you want.

He’s dead-on the money – and THAT’S why you’re so scared you’re down to sophomoric name-calling instead of debating him on the ideology.

Because you can’t. Name calling is all you got.

And to my conservative brethren on the right – take note:

When ideologically bankrupt moonbats like Thomas Friedman are touting globalism as a cure for all the world’s ills – perhaps it should be your clue that you’re on the wrong side of this issue.

You can buy Lou’s book here. It’s mandatory reading for anyone who is worried about Brown Sludge and who cares about what’s happening to America.

Entry Filed under: General, The Right Has It Wrong

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Dwight The Troubled Teen  |  March 1st, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    Ehrm….

    “left-wing lunatics like Friedman” ???

    Maybe it’s not fair to use the NYT as a barometer, but Tommy is considered by many to be the most conservative columnist they have.

    (On second thought, being the most conservative columnist at the Times is kind of like being the world’s tallest midget.)

    Ask a liberal what they thought of “The Earth is Flat.”

    “Moonbat?” Friedman??? Baffling. “Frustratingly Centrist,” Maybe.

    Mac, I won’t engage you on your support of protectionist trade policies. Don’t want to waste either of our time.

    I will posit the following.

    1. The genie is out of the lamp on Global Trade. There was a time when opposing it would have given folks in your position a chance to take the collossus out at the knees. That was 11 years ago.
    2. Americans are overpaid, and we are just going to have to deal with that reality.
    3. The longer the concept of American Union Organized Labor endures, the faster Amercian jobs will vanish. Jobs are running as much FROM that spectre as they are TO some perception of the benefit of foriegn labor.

    But we can agree to disagree, right?

  • 2. Mac  |  March 1st, 2006 at 5:07 pm

    Fair enough Dwight.

    I consider Mssr. Friedman to be a liberal worthy of the “moonbat” title based on the bulk of his columns.

    It’s true that he’s an outspoken hawk - having publically proclaimed that a blood-for-oil war was just okay with him - but - I’d put forth that a single feather doesn’t make the bird - when you look at Friedman’s larger body of work - he’s quite liberal.

    On you’re points (and they are very good ones) :

    1. You may be right on this. While I concede the facts would seem to be on your side on this point - I’m still hopeful that we’ll be able to stuff that particular genie right back in that bottle.

    2. I couldn’t disagree more. I suspect you might be someone who’s very much against the unions - which is fine - I’m certainly no fan myself - but I don’t believe for a moment that any independent American is overpaid [excepting porcine corporate CEO’s] - I have a deep and abiding belief in the ability of the individual to prosper limitlessly.

    3. Your point about the Unions is a valid one. But… I look at it like this: I see the Unions as chemo and radiation therapy for the cancer of Corporate Greed. As bad as I resent the Unions - their origins - their heavy-handed tactics and their impact on an individual’s freedom to work at what they want where they want - I resent their NECESSITY more.

    If Corporations played nice and never made underaged children work in unsanitary conditions or took advantage of people and payed people a decent wage - or never tried to make people work in blatantly unsafe and unhealthy conditions - there would be no need of Unions. I resent the hell out of that.

    As I’ve said before - chemo therapy and radiation are very damaging - indiscriminately killing healthy tissue too - and never something you would just “have” for “no reason”. But in the form of the Unions they (unfortunately) stand as an effective counter to pervading cancer of Corporatism.

    It’s VERY important to point out that it’s not JUST Union jobs that are being “offshored” at a frightening rate. Read my review piece on Lou Dobbs Exporting America. It points out that prestigious jobs in IT, the legal professions, the MEDICAL professions, and the financial and banking professions as well as other are being “offshored” at an equally stunning rate.

    Those aren’t Union jobs, brother.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Buy Independent


Left Bank Books
Shop Independent

del.icio.us

Calendar

March 2006
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

MetaData

  • Blogroll

  • Archives

    Pages