Walking The Walk On Big Oil
April 28th, 2006

I’ll buy a Ford if I have to
Regular readers of the Brown Sludge blog know that I’m all about Walking The Walk, as opposed to just Talking The Talk. To this end I always patronize small, local and independent over large, multinational and corporate when I can. I drive the extra mile, often I pay the extra price, and always, always, always I make the extra effort.
There are few more insidious examples of pure Brown Sludge than Big Oil, and I’ve spent a large portion of this week participating in discussions on forums and in the comment sections of some of the more right-leaning boards and blogs and it’s become pretty clear to me that most people, even rabid corporatists and Free Market Extremists understand that Big Oil is hurting people at the pump.
Typically their responses range from the moronic “Thank God the price of gasoline is going up! Now maybe people will finally start using less of it and they’ll start drilling domestically!” to shouts of glee from the Gordon Gekko cheerleading dolts who see obscene profits as a corporations only true mission statement.
Then you’ve got the misguided apologists (usually the tin-foil hat wearing libertarians), who resort to bizarre and ethereal mathematics to try to prove to the world that the price of gasoline is actually CHEAPER today than it was in years past. If you “adjust for inflation”, and wear your shirt backwards during the full moon phase of the third Tuesday of a month with an “R” in it’s name.
Adjusting for inflation is one thing, but you need a Doctor with a rubber glove and a flashlight to find the source of some of these poor peoples data. When you “adjust for inflation” bottled water is really $7.00 a gallon, and Haagan Daaz is $30.00 a gallon in “real terms” and gasoline is HARDER TO MAKE so we should be THANKFUL for $4.00 a gallon gasoline, because it should be a LOT more expensive.
Thanks, but… so far nobody has built a car that runs on water (conspiracy theories not withstanding) and ice cream isn’t the beating heart of the American economy. OIL is.
That’s why Big Oil and Big Pharma and Big Energy are entirely different classifications of businesses that require totally different outlooks. If the people at Haagan Daaz are making obscene profits and paying their CEO’s almost half a BILLION dollars in compensation who cares. The bottled water and ice cream industries are CUT THROAT competition industries – you gotta be good to make a buck, people have choices and can even choose to not buy either product if they so choose. Well… most people can. If I refused to buy chocolate Haagan Daaz when Pretty Jamie was having a rough week I’d be slowly emasculated with a cheese grater. No anesthetic of course.
When Big Oil gouges it hurts people by effectively lowering their incomes. When Big Pharma gouges, people don’t get well.
And BOTH of those industries have spent MILLIONS of dollars lobbying the government for legislation that kills competition, derails regulations, keeps prices high, and uses tax payers dollars to actually subsidize their multi-million dollar attempt to privatize all the profits and socialize all of the risks.
Any who considers themselves to be a Republican, Conservative, or Libertarian should be nothing less than outraged at that alone.
Those that are jumping through flaming hoops in an effort to defend the profit-taking of these companies NEVER speak to this issue. They NEVER face up to the truth that one of the reasons these companies are making outrageous profits is that they’ve utilized the Federal Government to give them advantages they should NEVER have been allowed to obtain.
It.
Is.
Obscene.
And those that have put themselves up as apologists for this behavior have some explaining to do. Soon.
So what’s to be done?
What’s the answer?
I’m not sure, but I am sure about what I’m going to do about it.
I’ve decided that I’m buying an E85 vehicle. I’m a huge Toyota fan, especially now since they’re more of an “American friendly” product than Ford or Chevy. I’m checking into an E85 Tacoma with a Flexible Fuel Mod.
Why E85?
Because it fits my personal philosophies so perfectly.
It means that Midwestern farms and farmers will now become the beating heart of the American economy, as they once were, and, more importantly that a handful of “wild-eyed pistol waivers who ain’t afraid to die” won’t be.
It means that Big Oil executives can go stand in line for a cot at the homeless shelter when regular gasoline drops to .79 cents a gallon because nobody wants it anymore.
It means that the speculation orgy that’s part of the current problem with gasoline prices will be deprived of their ability to jerk the consumers leash whenever they feel like it.
It means that I’ll be being far more environmentally responsible.
It means that when only 15% of a gallon of ethanol fuel is gasoline – that perhaps the United States will be able to stop importing oil completely.
It means that the wild-eyed pistol waivers can have their country back, because… few people will have any use for it anymore.
It means that the oil cartels and the OPEC Princes can spend their time deciding what to do with all that black goo that nobody wants anymore.
How do I know that E85 is the right thing? I don’t exactly, but I do know that Big Oil and many of it’s apologists are trying as hard as they can to discredit and crush the E85 movement, screaming from the rooftops that it’s just not a viable alternative.
That’s good enough for me.
Entry Filed under: General, Big Oil, The Right Has It Wrong

4 Comments Add your own
1. Dwight The Troubled Teen | May 3rd, 2006 at 7:28 am
I don’t know, Mac…
Corn is the SUV of crops. Few other kinds of farms require the amount of energy per acre to grow and harvest… Not to mention the elevated amount of pesticides that growing corn puts into ground water. (Corn requires a LOT of pesticide.)
I think the E85 is more a political solution than a long-term supply/cost solution.
But I agree that it’s a step in the right direction. I hate to poo-poo postitive change. Hydrogen is the most abundant element on the planet, I’d rather be distilling sea water into my gas tank. Now THAT is a definitive energy solution.
Still… I’ll take the solutions available to me… Even if it’s moonshine in my gas tank.
2. Mac | May 3rd, 2006 at 10:51 am
I just can’t argue with you about that Mr. Dwight. All of the data I’ve seen supports your position that corn requires a lot of energy to grow and isn’t as efficient as it should be as an energy source.
But I can’t help but shake the feeling that we’re not getting the entire story on it. Perhaps corn for fuel won’t need as many pesticides, because it’s not for human consumption. Perhaps refining technology will improve the process to the point where it’s doesn’t require as much energy to harvest.
I’m suspicious because many of the studies that support that position are funded by the people with the most to lose if E85 is adopted. That’s always a Big Red Flag with me.
Dude! If we could distill seawater into a viable fuel… I’d be the FIRST in line.
You make great points as usual.
3. G.U.N. Oil Report »&hellip | May 25th, 2006 at 9:19 am
[…] Lastly, over the BrownSludge we see another confused OpEd writer who doesn’t understand why gasoline is cheaper today than it has generally been for 30 years. He doesn’t see how inflation works, and he doesn’t understand that consumer inflation in products has caused inflation in wages which has caused inflation in more products. Fuel at US$3 per gallon, filtered water at US$3 per bottle and small houses at US$300,000 per 1/4 acre are all caused by inflation. When you compare these prices to our wages, and then make the same comparison to 1976, you can see that most higher prices today are only slightly higher or slightly lower than the same ratio 30 years ago. Inflation has occured, and only lately are we paying the real price of years of money supply devaluation as our debt burdens get the best of us. The OpEd writer puts a great idea forth that using E85 would mean less subsidies for large oil companies and a better economy locally, but you can not dismiss inflation’s price increase in consumer goods not necessarily meaning a real cost-value increase. Even worse, to think that large oil won’t transition to E85 and take over that market is to be ignorant of how all government works — always help your friends. […]
4. Mac | May 25th, 2006 at 1:31 pm
Adam Dada, the owner of “unimocracy.com” is a self-confessed “anarcho-captilist”.
The concept’s founding father, Murry Rothbard, had at one time tried to associate himself with everyone from the extreme anti-war left, to the Ayn Rand wing of the liberaterian party (see above “tin-foil hat” comparison), to the dang anarchists themselves.
He was pretty much shunned by all of them. LOL.
And dude… really… being shunned by the Ayn Rand Nutjobs is the functional equivilent of being thrown out of a pig pen for having hygene problems.
Like most libertarians who are obsessed with trying to pervert Ayn Rand’s doctrine of the individual into something that means nobody should have to abide by any moral constraints ever - he really ends up looking exceeding bizarre and foolish.
The ugly truth is that the extreme form of libertarianism that some folks try to attach themselves too is just not taken seriously by anyone who has had even the most rudimentary education in the political sciences. Period.
Just… read his piece for proof.
Now… I’d like to make clear that there are folks that I know that consider themselves “libertarians” who aren’t this “type” of libertarian, and I do draw a distinction there.
My younger brother is by all accounts an intelligent and well educated gentleman. I know him to be wise and coherent. He considers himself a “libertarian” I believe because he feels disenfranchised by the right, and a little reviled by the left. He chose libertarian because it was “door number 3″ as opposed to feeling trapped by the confines of a stullifying two-party system.
I’d be surprised to find out that he had researched true, grass-roots libertarianism and found himself okay with tribalism and well… fuedalism, which is the only path that raw libertarian philosophy can logically lead to.
I’d be more suprised to find that he had actually read and studied the works of Ayn Rand as I have, and came away with what I call the “Dirty Dancing” philosophy of “Some people matter, and some don’t” that many of the misguided do.
Like Mr. Dada.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed